[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: jade demo.sgm
[ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ] / cjwyche <cjwyche@io.com> was heard to say: | Solaris 2.5.1 and jade 1.1 fail in jade/dsssl/ doing the | demo. I seek answers to 4 questions. The details are shown | at http://www.io.com/~cjwyche/mvc/gw_n_jade.html | 1. Is the not having "DSSSL architecture" as a base an error | for the demo? You have to tell Jade that stylesheet you want to use. jade demo.sgm isn't sufficient. You need to say at least jade -d /path/to/styledocument demo.sgm And the styledocument has to have a doctype declaration that ultimately includes the DSSSL architecture DTDs. | 2. How am I to know if the resulting demo.fot is correct? If you don't get any errors from Jade. There's no validator for FOTs. | 3. Where do I find switch option descriptions? http://www.jclark.com/ | 4. The openjade "list" seems to be 6 developers as opposed | to users. What email lists do you suggest I engage for | getting ideas about solutions for docbooks problems I expect | I will be encountering? docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org and/or dssslist@mulberrytech.com Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The formula 'Two and two make http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | five' is not without its Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | attractions.--Dostoevsky
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC