Re: DOCBOOK: Re: RFE 472229: Allow HTML Tables in DocBook

[Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>]

At 15:29 01/12/2001 +0100, giacomo wrote:
>On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> > At 15:34 30/11/2001 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> >
> > >3. Won't tool vendors have to support mixed namespaces "real soon now"
> > >    anyway, for things like XLink, SVG, MathML, etc. So tools will
> > >    actually be able to handle this?
> >
> > Yes.
> > I'd love to be able to include some SVG.
>
>More important for me is XInclude to modularize documentation parts at
>this point.


The point about tools slipped by me.
Docbook without emacs isn't much good to me.

Regards DaveP