[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Functions like php.net
/ Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> was heard to say: | On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:31:22AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: | | > / sanger@math.muni.cz (Michal Sanger) was heard to say: | > | In PHP semantic I have declaration: | > | string MyFunction(string param1, string param2[, int number]); | [...] | > There's a switch in the stylesheets to select between K&R style | > and ANSI style function synopses. If you turn that switch to 'ansi', I | > think you'll get something closer to what you want. | | As well as the K&R/ANSI formatting, there is the other issue of | optional parameters like '[, int number]'. As far as I can tell there | isn't any good way to mark that up currently. Yeah, that seems to be the case. I wonder which makes more sense: 1. Allow <optional> somehow in the funcprototype markup, or 2. Add an attribute like choice to paramdef (similar to arg and group). Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One's never alone with a rubber http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | duck. Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC