[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: A proposal to clarify the semantics of DocBookgraphics
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:47:41PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Rory Hunter <roryh@fenriz.org> was heard to say: > | Something like, mediawidth vs. reproductionwidth (but not to pretentious)? > > I take your point. Unfortunately, removing the existing attributes > would require waiting until DocBook V6.0. And the semantics of the > existing attributes are reproductionwidth and reproductiondepth. Maybe I'm just confused, but I'd rather distinguish: physicalwidth (or mediawidth) the actual width of the image viewportwidth the width of the area in which the image is to be reproduced reproductionwidth the effective width of the image If I understand well, in the current proposal "width" stands for my "reproductionwidth", "contentwidth" stands for my "physicalwidth", and we have nothing for my "physicalwidth". Right ? -- Yann Dirson <Yann.Dirson@fr.alcove.com> http://www.alcove.com/ Free-Software Engineer Ingénieur Logiciel-Libre Free-Software time manager Responsable du temps Informatique-Libre Debian GNU/Linux developper <dirson@debian.org>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC