DOCBOOK: Re: Use of <varargs> and <paramdef>

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ John.Himpel@edwardjones.com was heard to say:
| Is my attempted markup logical or is the DTD more logical?
|
| What is the "proper" way? 

This is discussed in the reference page for funcsynopsis[1]. If you file
an RFE, we might be able to fix the content model. (I can't recall, off the top
off my head, if that introduces ambiguity or not.)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

[1] http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcsynopsis

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Why shouldn't things be largely
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | absurd, futile, and transitory?
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | They are so, and we are so, and
                                   | they and we go very well
                                   | together.--Santayana