[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Using glossterms to refer to refentries
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / BigSmoke <bigsmoke@home.nl> was heard to say: | I'm having a tight semantic problem: I have many things in my document which | are described by refentries. However, I want to point to these as if it where | glossentries. Am I abusing semanticas if I where to do the following? | | <glossterm linkend='refentry-myObject'>myObject</glossterm> I think so. Why do you want to treat them as glossary entries if they're reference pages? Are they semantically glossary terms as far as your concerned? Why do you want glossterm instead of simply 'link' or 'xref'? Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There might very well be nothing; http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | nor anyone. No one to notice that Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | there is nothing, and to consider | that natural. But that there is | something, and, whatever it may | be, the strange thing! I shall | never cease being amazed at | this.--André Gide -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+EF5TOyltUcwYWjsRAouSAJ0Wymmd2DnNMFeZuLPm3aQALdb7NQCeOvOh sDfaLIYlPabGVvpbNQBz710= =CY9u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC