[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: para versus simpara?
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > Some users want to prevent paragraphs from containing "block" elements > (as HTML does). The simpara element gives them an alternative to para > that has the semantics they want. And they can make a customization > layer that's a proper subset of DocBook simply by removing the 'para' > element from the DTD. I like the TEI way more to accomplish some such alternative definition: don't introduce a new element but redefine the standard element using a parameter inside your internal doctype declaration. -- ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): | http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o Free Translation Project: | _-\_<, http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC