[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 Mar 2003
Yet another 2 cents (Canadian, at that :-) This thread has been quite entertaining and educational. I appreciate the desire to make things easy to learn, but in light of the paradigm shift that must take place when moving from HTML to DocBook, learning a few more (meaningful) tagnames and how to apply them (within their consistent framework) seems inconsequential, as Mr. Kosek has pointed out. I would agree more with the arguments in favor of the simplicity of supporting one table model, of aiming for 100% consistency (for <title> etc.), and of having meaningful tagnames. I notice that most members of the committee are "willing" to include the XHTML table model, but that wording gives me the feeling that not all of them are demanding it. It wouldn't hurt or help me very much if the TC agreed to include the XHTML model, but I don't think it's vitally necessary, nor do I believe it to be particularly consistent with the intent of DocBook. Cheerio! Bob --------------------------------------- Robert McIlvride (robert@cogent.ca) Cogent Real-Time Systems (www.cogent.ca)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]