[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: marking up keycaps according to their semantics
Steinar Bang wrote: > Empty <keycap> elements is already allowed by today's DTD. I see. Then all that's left is to add an attribute :) (the name might be "function", "control", "action", or etc) > Remember, <keycap/> is just the same as <keycap></keycap>. sure > The reason I might wish for a different element with an EMPTY content > model, is to make psgml (and other DTD aware editors) just insert an > <functionkey/> > element instead of an > <keycap></keycap> > when I press C-c C-e. > > And I would agree that this reason may not be a very good reason to > add to the complexity of DocBook...:-) yep, tools come after the lang IMHO (where trade-offs have to be made) Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]