docbook message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Jeff Biss <jeff@marco-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:04:48 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:

> If I may inquire, what ever happened to your RFE? I assume it wasn't 
> implemented, any reason why?

well, i submitted it this morning.  i guess norm is slacking
again. :-)

rday

Follow-Ups:
- DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

References:
- Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
  - From: Jeff Biss <jeff@marco-inc.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]