Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?

["John R. Daily" <john@geekhavoc.com>]

At (time_t)1047491475 Steve Cogorno wrote:

> Procedure's aren't simply a list of steps - steps can have alternatives,
> substeps and content that introduces the steps. If procedures were permitted
> in para, then procdures could nest within themselves.

They already can, as direct children of other procedures or as
the contents of a step.

--
John R. Daily
<email><mailbox>john</mailbox><domain>geekhavoc.com</domain></email>