[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: docbook xml.schema
> | Probably nice, you are a master of XML style. But is it stable ? Should > | I use <xs:redefine/> like on an other official declared schema ? > > If you're using it, and your tool supports redefine, go for it. I > can't promise the schema is stable before it's official (which is most > likely to occur at the next release) but I don't think it's going to > change in any dramatic way. Is this the one under CVS or should I generate it with the last trang? Anyway, thanks for the answer. I can't exactly say that tools understand xs:redefine (spy seems sometimes, if there's not too much inherited mixed contents), but isn't it the right way to publish an official schema close to docbook? For real life, a shorter schema for each root element appears me better (generation probably possible), especially when there are different jobs (bibliography, article for redactors, toc for editors, perhaps more; that will be the case in this organisation). But you have more experience than me on those kinds of projects. Any advice welcome.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]