Re: [docbook] Request: Feedback on proposal for new URI element

[Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>]

At 11:40 AM +0200 6/17/03, Tobias Reif wrote:
>Michael Smith wrote:
>
>-----------------
>>    1.1 Processing expectations
>>       Unlike the Ulink element, Uri is not rendered as
>>       an actual hyperlink to the content found at the
>>       location it references. Instead, it appears as
>>       literal text, perhaps distinguished
>>       typographically (for example, in monospace or
>>       italic type).
>
>
>I'd be happy if the spec generally would be less media specific. In 
>aural etc media, there is no italic type.

This is just a reasonable example of what you might choose to do. 
It's not normative. I see no problem here.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@metalab.unc.edu
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA