Re: [docbook] Request: Feedback on proposal for new URI element

[Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>]

At 3:01 PM +0900 6/17/03, Michael Smith wrote:

>The only difference between this proposal and the one I posted
>previously is that this version omits the "class" attribute on the
>uri element. (The content model in the original proposal included a
>class attribute to indicate whether this URI was a URL or a URN.
>However, consensus during the TC discussion about the element was that
>this URL/URN class attribute was not actually needed).

I'd still prefer to have the class attribute, but it's not a big 
deal. Otherwise, this looks good.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@metalab.unc.edu
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA