[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dbx g2] using modules; version attribute
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Bob Stayton <bobs@sco.com> was heard to say: | I would agree that if modularization becomes an option, | then it must be easy to use. My concern with schema modules | is that it could make things more complex. Currently | you can specify a single DTD and everyone knows | what's in it, and the tools know what they have to deal | with. A single DTD may be big, but it is simpler than handling | multiple possible combinations of modules. Exactly. I think the core has to be large enough to be generally useful and the extensions have to be domain-specific enough to not appear generally useful. But that's always going to be subjective. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is impossible to defeat an http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | ignorant man in an Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | argument.--William G. McAdoo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/FyeNOyltUcwYWjsRAhr1AJ9BRuW2/FSmKhPlCli9Ch78Vmn/TACfUaqG P2QI2j97XBhh9TWej1baG08= =O5ub -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]