Re: [docbook] Re: Ruminations on the future of DocBook

[Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>]

At 15:37 17/07/2003 -0700, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>/ Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> was heard to say:
>| If relaxng is used, it would be nice to have some DTD based subset that 
>whilst
>| not 100%, gave us a clue, and helped in increasing productivity, for
>| later validation
>| by a relaxng tool?
>
>I think it will be important to generate DTD and W3C XML Schema versions of
>DocBook. It may be that these schemas will be less constraining (and therefore
>incomplete for validation purposes) but they'll allow other tools to work with
>DocBook.

+1 for DTD's.

-0 for xsd?

regards DaveP