[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] questions about the future of docbook (ng)...
Craeg K Strong wrote: > In a nutshell, you would have a relatively small "core" set of > constructs, and then each dialect/usage > (such as article, book, review, resume, business letter, journal entry, > meeting minutes, role description, design pattern, > slideshow presentation, brochure, etc. etc) would be defined by its own > stand-alone schema/DTD files which > would *include* the appropriate core pieces. I can see two orthogonal concepts here: The one is more concerned about the form ('article' vs. 'book' vs. 'slides') while the other is about domain-specific vocabularies ('business letter' vs. 'design pattern'). I'm only talking about the domain-specific vocabularies when suggesting a modular / extensible approach. It's an interesting question, though, how this other dimension (for which I still lack a term) relates to this. How could a user possibly choose vocabularies ("I'd like to write a book about our in-house software development process" vs. "I'd like to make a slideshow about this and that analysis model" etc.) Regards, Stefan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]