[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook] marking up reserved words
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfgang Jeltsch > Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2004 19:18 schrieb Mauritz Jeanson: > > [...] > > > Hello Bob, > > How about <token>? > > Not so good, in my opinion. From "DocBook: The Definitive > Guide 2.0.10 > (Alpha)": > > A Token identifies a unit of information. Usually, > "tokens" are the result > of some processing pass that has performed lexical > analysis and divided a > data set into the smallest units of information used for > subsequent > processing. > > So token elements in DocBook are mostly for tokens which are > output by a > lexer. These cover reserved words but cover also several > other kinds of > data. That's why I think that the token element is not so > appropriate. Markup semantics is not easy... It would be nice to have more good examples in the TDG. I found a passing remark about <token> and reserved words here: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/markup.html#d369e782 /MJ
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]