[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Footnote with extra text
Darryl Champagne <dgc03052@adelphia.net> writes: > This is an old toolchain, using passivetex for PDF generation (which I know > isn't really supported anymore), so I'm sure it's something specific to my > environment.... I have the original environment archived (pre stylesheet and > latex update), so I'll track down when it broke.... > > As long as it isn't a known issue... > > I'll follow-up when I track it down. > > I think the .fo is OK, but I'm not as good at reading it.... > > <fo:block space-before.optimum="1em" space-before.minimum="0.8em" > space-before.maximum="1.2em">This is an example of a paragraph with a > footnote in it. The footnote is defined > inline<fo:footnote><fo:inline><fo:inline font-size="75%" > font-weight="normal" font-style="normal" > baseline-shift="super">1</fo:inline></fo:inline><fo:footnote-body > font-family="serif,Symbol,ZapfDingbats" font-size="8pt" font-weight="normal" > font-style="normal" text-align="justify" > start-indent="0pt"><fo:block><fo:inline font-size="75%" font-weight="normal" > font-style="normal" baseline-shift="super">1</fo:inline>This footnote is > defined inline.</fo:block></fo:footnote-body></fo:footnote> so that it can > be generated at the bottom of the page<fo:inline font-size="75%" > font-weight="normal" font-style="normal" > baseline-shift="super">1</fo:inline> That FO output looks fine, so I am pretty sure it is Passivetex problem. But I can't reproduce in my environment because Passivetex fails with the test doc I'm trying with ("! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing \item." error). I would be happy to try testing with your source if you want to send a copy to me. But it does seem to be a Passivetex problem, and the only way I personally have ever found for dealing with Passivetex problems is to change the markup in your source to try to work around them. To get PDF output using an open-source toolchain, you might want to give dblatex a try - http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=72607 > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Smith [mailto:smith@xml-doc.org] > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:18 PM > To: Darryl Champagne > Cc: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [docbook] Footnote with extra text > > Darryl Champagne <dgc03052@adelphia.net> writes: > > > Hi, > > Is anyone seeing any footnote problems with the 1.69.1 xsl .fo > stylesheets? > > I recently upgraded, and the following text: > > (within an article/section) > > <para>This is an example of a paragraph with a footnote in it. > > The footnote is defined inline<footnote id="fn1" label="1"> > > <para>This footnote is defined inline.</para></footnote> > > so that it can be generated at the bottom of the page<footnoteref > > linkend="fn1"/> > > </para> > > > > Now generates a footnote of "This footnote is defined inline. so that it > can > > be generated at the bottom of the page", instead of just the first > sentence > > in the footnote, and the second sentence being in the main paragraph. > > I can't reproduce the problem. What XSLT engine are you using? Can > you try testing with a different XSLT engine and see if you get > the same result? > -- Michael Smith http://sideshowbarker.net/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]