[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] http://docbook.sourceforge.net/ problem
I've added a link at the top of the page to a "text-only version" of the same content. It is the same content, included by reference, but without the Javascript and with an alternate CSS stylesheet. --Mike Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 18:53 +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > > > > And How accessible is it Michael? > > > > If there are accessibility issues with it, let me know. > I'm afraid I can't navigate it readily without a mouse; > that gives me doubts. > > > > > It's a strange GUI, to me quite against > > > the more straightforward ideas of docbook. > > > > Interactive website design and DocBook are two different things. > OK. That's a view. > > > > Is there any real reason for choosing such > > > a weak design? > > > > Because it's cool? Because I like it? Because other people like > > it? Because it works well? Because it is a clean and simple > > design? > > Works well for whom? -- Michael(tm) Smith http://tokyo.metblogs.com/ http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/890
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]