[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Bibliographies
You might consider using something like this for keywords: <biblioset role="keywords"> <bibliocoverage>one key word</bibliocoverage> <bibliocoverage>another key word</bibliocoverage> </biblioset> That might be a misuse of bibliocoverage, so perhaps bibliomisc would be better for each key word. Being contained in a biblioset with a role provides a context to assign semantics and allow the stylesheet to handle them. For classification numbers, perhaps biblioid with a role would be appropriate. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Mundie" <mundie@anthus.com> To: <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 7:52 PM Subject: [docbook] Bibliographies > I'm relatively new to Docbook, and would appreciate someone's > confirming a conclusion I have come to. For my application, I need to > have keywords and classification numbers in my bibliographic entries. > The conclusion I've come to is that the only way to do that in > Docbook is by means of bibliomisc elements, since keywordsets and > subjectsets are (for some reason) not allowed in biblioentries. Is > there a better strategy I've overlooked? > > - dam > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]