OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

docbook message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [docbook] Bibliographies


You might consider using something like this for keywords:

<biblioset role="keywords">
  <bibliocoverage>one key word</bibliocoverage>
  <bibliocoverage>another key word</bibliocoverage>
</biblioset>

That might be a misuse of bibliocoverage, so perhaps bibliomisc would be
better for each key word. Being contained in a biblioset with a role
provides a context to assign semantics and allow the stylesheet to handle
them.

For classification numbers, perhaps biblioid with a role would be
appropriate.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs@sagehill.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Mundie" <mundie@anthus.com>
To: <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 7:52 PM
Subject: [docbook] Bibliographies


> I'm relatively new to Docbook, and would appreciate someone's
> confirming a conclusion I have come to. For my application, I need to
> have keywords and classification numbers in my bibliographic entries.
> The conclusion I've come to is that the only way to do that in
> Docbook is by means of bibliomisc elements, since keywordsets and
> subjectsets are (for some reason) not allowed in biblioentries. Is
> there a better strategy I've overlooked?
>
>   - dam
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>
>




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]