RE: [docbook] DocBook XSL 1.34 - Bug with passivetex

["Mauritz Jeanson" <mj@johanneberg.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Slater 
> 
> > Pro: There are people who do use PassiveTeX and manage to 
> work around some
> > of the problems (including the one you refer to):
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/200509/msg00032.html.
> 
> Yes, this much has become apparent. What is the preferred free way of
> processing FO?


I was going to say FOP, but you mention
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html in another post, so in your
case it seems out of the question.


> > DocBook XSL v1.34 is rather old, but maybe you have good 
> reasons to stick
> > with it.
> 
> This is the version of the stylesheets on my machine - and I am
> running an up to date Debian (unstable) distro. How far behind am I?
> :)


Almost five years, I think. 

/MJ