[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: [docbook-tc] DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 15 March 2006
Norman Walsh wrote: > I think there might be some value in having the version attribute be a > list of tokens. so I propose a small modification: > > base_version-[subset|extension|variant]? [name-[version]?]+ > > For example: > > 5.0-subset simplified-1.0 > 5.0-variant ASMBook > 5.0 ASMBook-2006 > 5.0-extension MathML-2.0 SVG-1.1 Seems reasonable change for me. > I don't see any particular value in leaving subset/extension/variant > optional, but I don't feel strongly about it. I inherited this behaviour from rules for creating custom FPIs. "Variant" was not mandatory there, so I thought that there was some reason behind for this. If this is not the case, what about making extension/subset/variant mandatory? Like base_version-[subset|extension|variant] [name-[version]?]+ Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML. Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nejbližší termíny školení: ** XSLT 13.-16.3.2006 ** XML schémata 24.-26.4.2006 ** ** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ http://xmlguru.cz Blog mostly about XML for English readers ------------------------------------------------------------------
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]