Re: [docbook] Re: [docbook-tc] DocBook Technical Committee MeetingMinutes: 15 March 2006

[Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>]

Norman Walsh wrote:

> I think there might be some value in having the version attribute be a
> list of tokens. so I propose a small modification:
> 
>   base_version-[subset|extension|variant]? [name-[version]?]+
> 
>   For example:
> 
>   5.0-subset simplified-1.0
>   5.0-variant ASMBook
>   5.0 ASMBook-2006
>   5.0-extension MathML-2.0 SVG-1.1

Seems reasonable change for me.

> I don't see any particular value in leaving subset/extension/variant
> optional, but I don't feel strongly about it.

I inherited this behaviour from rules for creating custom FPIs. 
"Variant" was not mandatory there, so I thought that there was some 
reason behind for this. If this is not the case, what about making 
extension/subset/variant mandatory? Like

     base_version-[subset|extension|variant] [name-[version]?]+


					Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Nejbližší termíny školení:
      ** XSLT 13.-16.3.2006 ** XML schémata 24.-26.4.2006 **
        ** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 **
------------------------------------------------------------------
   http://xmlguru.cz    Blog mostly about XML for English readers
------------------------------------------------------------------

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature