Re: [docbook] Re: How to handle lost functionality regarding thetoc element and lot element in DocBook 5

["Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com>]

Norm,

Thanks.  The note I was referring to was in the specification.  Table 1
says that

  lot, lotentry, tocback, tocchap, tocfront, toclevel1, toclevel2, 
  toclevel3, toclevel4, toclevel5, tocpart

are

  Replaced by simpler tocdiv element.

I haven't checked the How To; it may also need some changes.

Since an empty toc is valid, I can recode <lot role="figure"/> with
<toc remap="lot" role="figure"/>.  We may add a class attribute to toc
to provide an enumerated list of values; it makes it easier on new
authors.

I tested against the role version against the V5.0b5 RelaxNG and it
validates.  Just a matter of changing the match in our XSLT.

Thanks again.

Larry Rowland


On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 09:23 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / "Rowland, Larry" <larry.rowland@hp.com> was heard to say:
> | as a child of chapter or appendix to trigger the ToC generation.  It
> | would be desirable to preserve this capability in the new version of
> | DocBook.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> | The writeup for DocBook 5.0 says <tocdiv>  replaces the functionality of
> | <lot>, but it was not clear how this would work.
> 
> I think that's a small error in the howto. It'd be clearer to say that
> "toc" replaces "lot".
> 
> | If eliminating <lot> is desirable, perhaps we could use an empty ToC
> | with a class attribute or something similar.
> 
> Yep. And you can do that today :-) DocBook 5.0 allows an empty <toc/>.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>