Re: [docbook] db.effectivity.attributes definition

[Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>]

Camille Bégnis wrote:

> while writing a specialization of DB5, I noticed the
> db.effectivity.attributes definition directly holds the list of
> attributes, instead of further referencing attributes definitions.
> 
> That forces to redefine the whole db.effectivity.attributes definition
> just to specialize userlevel for instance.
> Since some of those attributes are used in profiling, I think it will
> not be uncommon to see them specialized by constraining them to a fixed
> list of possible values. Hence the interest of separate definitions for
> each of those attributes.
> 
> I hope it makes sense, if so should I submit a RFE?

Definitively, this should be fixed.
Now I see that I encountered this bug few months ago, but I forgot to do 
something :-(

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Nejbližší termíny školení:
     ** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
      ** DocBook 11.-13.12.2006 ** XSL-FO 11.-12.12.2006 **
------------------------------------------------------------------
   http://xmlguru.cz    Blog mostly about XML for English readers
------------------------------------------------------------------

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature