[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Add topic element to DocBook?
/ "Michael(tm) Smith" <smith@sideshowbarker.net> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, 2006-10-26 08:59 -0400: | |> As a slight extension of this model, we could also add a <tasktopic> |> element. This would address the feature request[1] for "task" as a |> peer to "section". If we did this, then I'd expect "topic" or |> "tasktopic" to be allowed anywhere I've mentioned topic above. | | What content model would Tasktopic have? Roughly the same content model as topic, I assume. | And "tasktopic" ain't a pretty name. What about naming it | "process" or "operation" instead? (Yeah I know those stink too, | but they stink less than "tasktopic".) Well, I kind of like having "topic" in the name if its a kind of topic because topics represent a pretty high-level design choice in your documentation. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'All is vanity,' saith the http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | Preacher. But if all were only Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | vanity, who would mind? Alas, it | is too often worse than vanity: | agony, darkness, death | also.--Thomas Hardy
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]