[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] alternative topic proposal
On Monday 30 October 2006 22:32, Bob Stayton wrote: > f we also introduce the idea of topicref, then we are adding new > capabilities to DocBook to assemble these modules into sequences and > hierarchies. The difference from XInclude is that a topicref is resolved > by an XSLT process, so the assembly process can actively filter and fix > content rather than just copy it into place. That's a big gain in modular > processing, if you need it. I agree that this is a benefit. Still however, I am not convinced that this must be an attribute of a new element. Why can't we have this anyway, on existing elements? -- Ask me about the Monkey. Sean Wheller Technical Author sean@inwords.co.za +27-84-854-9408 http://www.inwords.co.za
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]