[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] keycap vs keysym
Quoting Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>: > Emacs is very heavy on key bindings. > M-C-F1 is press ALT, control and F1. > > How might that be marked up? > M-x revert-buffer is another command. > > It seems a mix between user input and key|sym|cap > There is no 'M' key (stands for META). > The Emacs meta key is especially weird as it depends on the keyboard and your environment. E.g. on a PC running a graphical interface, the Alt key works ok if you press it simultaneously with another key. When running in a terminal, Alt may not work, and you have to resort to pressing the Esc key as a prefix key, followed by the next key. The former might be represented as: <keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap>x</keycap></keycombo> whereas the latter would be something like: <keycap>Esc</keycap><keycap>x</keycap> So even if you would move away from the key caps to not depend on what is printed on the key, you'd still be wrong about pressing the keys at the same time or one after the other in 50% of the cases. But I also think if you're writing about Emacs for end users, the key caps are what counts. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka markus.hoenicka@cats.de (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]