Re: [docbook] keycap vs keysym

[Markus Hoenicka <markus.hoenicka@mhoenicka.de>]

Quoting Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>:

> Markus, I agree about Meta not being a 'key'... but
> in the emacs manuals I think it would be plain.
> Given that caveat, can you improve on Thomas' input above?
>

No, looks good to me too.

> C-x w r    means  unhighlight-regexp
>
> <keycombo> seems wrong with the combinations?
> <keycombo>C-x</keycombo><userinput>w r</
>

My gut feeling is that in this case "w r" should not be treated as  
userinput, but as keypresses that belong to a command sequence. This  
is different from pressing M-x, which gets you into a command prompt  
in the minibuffer. So, the former should be like (leaving out the  
attribute tinsel):

<keycombo><keycap>Ctrl</keycap><keycap>x</keycap></keycombo><keycap>w</keycap><keycap  
 >r</keycap>

whereas I'd write the latter as:

<keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap>x</keycap></keycombo><keycap>revert-buffer</keycap>

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
markus.hoenicka@cats.de
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka")
http://www.mhoenicka.de