[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: db._phrase
Norman Walsh wrote: > The content model of db.phrase includes *all* the inlines. So if, for example, > db.phrase was allowed inside abbrev, then this would be legal: > > <abbrev><phrase><constant>PI</constant></phrase></abbrev> > > even though this *is not* legal: > > <abbrev><constant>PI</constant></abbrev> > ... > Make sense? I think so. Let me paraphrase my understanding: for purposes of validation, a doc which includes db.phrase and/or db._phrase elements will validate against the DB schema if and only if the doc validates when the <phrase>, <_phrase>, </phrase> and </_phrase> tags are simply omitted, with one potential exception. The exception would be if the <phrase> or <_phrase> elements were marked with invalid attributes. So for purposes of validation, the db.phrase and db._phrase elements are "transparent." Is that correct? -- Mike Maxwell What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it? --Robert Dicke, Princeton physicist
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]