[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] GSoC 2010 - Integration of BoostBook with DocBook
On 04/05/2010 08:05 PM, maxwell wrote: > > IMHO, DB is already *far* too cluttered with constructs that are specific > to programming languages. Rather than add more programming language > "stuff", I think what's already in DB should be moved into one or more > separate libraries or modules, preferably with their own namespace. A > namespace change for some subset will be non-backwards compatible, but I > don't think that's a reason to avoid it. > I fully agree with what you are saying, and can happily confirm that this is indeed the idea: The added vocabulary will go into an extension profile, and thus be available as a separate module, to be explicitly referenced from a different namespace. In fact, I hope that a similar strategy may be chosen for other ports, such as the Website and Slides vocabularies, when they are ported to DocBook 5. Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]