[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Acronym Expansion (was RE: [docbook-tc] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 15 December 2010)
Dnia piątek, 21 stycznia 2011 o 18:25:17 Rowland, Larry napisał(a): > This does, however, place the burden on the author to make sure that any > expansion of the term provided in the glossary is consistent with that > provided in the body of the document. I would likely use an entity for the > contents of the glossterm and the termdef in a 4.x document based on DTDs. > It becomes slightly more challenging in 5.0 unless the transclusion proposal > being discussed is implemented (adding a DTD just to get entities seems like > a kludge to me). Note that some validating XML processors, e.g. MSXML, need special tweaking lest they reject documents with incomplete DTD. Best regards, Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]