Re: [docbook] Markup suggestions please?

[davep <davep@dpawson.co.uk>]

On 12/06/2011 11:06 PM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 6.12.2011 19:36, davep wrote:
>
> > What about markup for an assembly level instruction?
> >
> > <instr proc='ARM'>vadd</
> >    Suggest anything to improve on that?
> Do you really need such precise markup.

> If you don't want to customize DocBook then semantically closest is
> probably function element.

function is miles off semantic markup Jirka?
OK, agreed about proc being excessive, but IMHO there is
nothing to cover assembler in docbook.
With its goal, that seems like a shortcoming to me.
  I'll customize the schema.

regards



regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk