[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: XInclude 1.1
"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: >> There's an xpath() scheme and it's pretty widely supported, I believe. > > I cannot seem to find any information about the xpath() scheme in > xpointer, except your earlier email mentioning that you implemented it > in Calabash. It is listed on the W3C XPointer Registry, but the > "specification" link goes to the W3C spec for XPath 2.0. I doubt the > xpath() scheme supports the entire XPath 2.0 standard. Do you know > where the scheme originated and who maintains it? And which processors > have implemented it? I don't believe there's an independent spec for it. If you claim to support the xpath() scheme, I believe the expectation is that you will support all of XPath (1 or 2). Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One must look for one thing only, http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | to find many.--Cesare Pavese Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
Attachment:
pgphuq5ZCtyjb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]