[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] To Namespace or Not To Namespace
On 3.10.2014 18:21, Steve Cuzner wrote: > I'm investigating porting our 4.x docbook to 5.x. For our custom > elements, I'm considering adding them to our own namespace so that it > is more obvious which elements are docbook and which are custom to > our extension. While technically not necessary given that any > customizations makes it not DocBook, what are the pros and cons of > namespacing our own extension elements? Putting custom elements into a separate namespace will make authoring much more less convenient. I usually prefer easier authoring over possible future class of newly introduced standard DocBook element. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]