[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DTD from extended RNC
At 2018-05-21T21:24:13+01:00, Peter Flynn wrote: > If you don't mind creating a rather more difficult-to-maintain DTD, you > can always take an existing DTD and edit it by hand. Cumbersome but > possible. I'll probably spend a substantial part of the next several years writing in this schema, and I may have to modify it sometimes. Given that, and the fact that it is difficult for me to extend a DTD, I guess I will abandon the idea of creating a customised DocBook DTD, and will instead write a customised RNC, along the lines that I have posted. >> 2. Is it possible to get a DTD for 5.1? > > It does claim that the TC provides this. I have opened an issue at the docbook/docbook GitHub repository about the missing DTD, https://github.com/docbook/docbook/issues/103 >> 3. Is it important to use an editor that understands RELAX NG? > But IMNSHO it is just as important that you pick an editor whose > interface you feel comfortable with. I you're going to be using an > editor for a long time (maybe the rest of your life), you need to pick > something usable. That is Emacs for me. The choice is then between nXML mode and PSGML mode. Since PSGML needs a DTD, since I have given up on writing a customised DTD in favour of an RNC, and since `trang' does not convert that RNC to a DTD, I have to give up on PSGML mode. So, I will necessarily be using nXML mode. I am planning to separate out the nXML code from the Emacs distribution into a local package, and modify it incrementally in an attempt to add a few features. Thank you. Raghu. -- N. Raghavendra <raghu@hri.res.in>, http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute, http://www.hri.res.in/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]