Re: DSML futures

[rweltman@netscape.com (Rob Weltman)]

James Tauber wrote:

> The following were identified by the DSML 1.0 WG as work items that were of
> potential interest but outside the scope of 1.0
>
> Perhaps these could form the basis for discussing the scope for the
> subsequent revisions to DSML to be produced by the proposed OASIS TC:
>
> - specification of queries against a directory
> - indication of source of directory entries
> - organization of directory entries hierarchically
> - normalization of distinguished names
> - directory access method, communication of error messages, etc
> - directory content manipulation
> - access control information
>

  Yes. I'd prioritize them in the following order:

1, 4, 6, 5, 7, 2, 3

Rob

>
> James (DSML Discussion Lead)
> --
> James Tauber
> jtauber@bowstreet.com
> Director XML Technology
> Bowstreet www.bowstreet.com