RE: the approach (discussion topic for con call)

[James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>]

> One thing if I may add; we seems drifting toward creating an object model
(in 
> addition to the data model).  This concerns me a little bit; getting the
object 
> model may be a good requirement, but hopefully it's not at the expesense
of getting 
> a clean XML representation of LDAP operations.  

Right. This is why I want the data model to be a separate task to the API. I
want to have a clean, agreed upon data model irrespective of the API.

James (who's working on the data model right now from a hotel in Manhattan
:-)