RE: DRAFT DATA MODEL

[James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>]

> model just enough
> to cover RDF [the principal reason being that I'd like DSML 
> to be *the*
> XML-based way of querying and modifying not only LDAP 
> directories but
> directory-like systems that are really close to LDAP. There 
> aren't people
> that are already putting DSML interfaces on relational 
> data.

Whoops! I meant there *are* people putting DSML interfaces on relational
data.

> I don't want
> to allow that in general, but if the relational data 
> resembles the data
> model here, I want to be able to allow DSML to be the query and
> modification framework.]