dsml message

Subject: Re: [dsml] Proposed TC response to SAP

From: John McGarvey <mcgarvey@us.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Parham <jeffparh@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:58:53 -0500

Jeff,

This is a good response.  Thanks for the effort.  I will quibble with one
point:

"Since the only bindings detailed in the DSMLv2 specification are
request-response, AbandonRequest has no meaning for them.  The TC should
have removed AbandonRequest from the DSMLv2 schema."

The only bindings detailed in the DSMLv2 specification are
request-response, but it was intended that other bindings for the DSMLv2
schema could be created with support for asynchronous flows.
AbandonRequest has no meaning for the currently defined bindings, which are
request-response, but might be useful for other bindings.

Regards,

John

John McGarvey
IBM directory architect
919-877-4892 or t/l 254-4892