[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] some changes in requirements draft 3
At 01:23 AM 4/11/2003 -0400, jmessing wrote: >However, none of these assertions apply to eNotarization in the presence >of a notary, as the notary does the authentication in person. So... at >least one use case is automatically excluded by this choice. Why is that >desirable or laudable? A SAML Authentication Assertion could have an <AuthenticationMethod> of "unspecified", or a new AuthenticationMethod could be defined to represent notary-style human authentication. Is there a better solution that you're thinking of? Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]