RE: [dss] anonymous types

[Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>]

At 04:56 PM 10/6/2003 -0400, you wrote:

>Trevor - This issue doesn't just come up when one uses a definition from one
>schema in another schema.  We might use the same type definition in a number
>of places in our own schema.  Then we will be forced to use the same name.

That's true - we should use named types in that case, but for things that 
we don't re-use or expect anyone else to re-use, anonymous types seem simpler.

Trevor