Re: [dss] Signature/Properties QName issue

[Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz <cruellas@ac.upc.es>]

All,

Reading the TAG doc, seems clear that they generally
recommend usage of URIs...
I would not have problems in using them for properties, but
then this puts on the table the question of the values for these URIs...
would it make sense, for instance, using there the namespaces where
these properties have been defined, which means something like

http://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.1.1#SignatureTimeStamp

or do you think that the URI should be completely defined by dss?


Juan Carlos.

At 11:31 09/02/2004 -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
>> <Properties>
>> <Identifier>
>> foo:bar OR http://abc.org/bar
>> </Identifier>
>> </Properties>
>
>If that is the issue, than I completely agree that qnames as element 
>content are a sign of the apocalypse and must be avoided at all costs.
>At this point the only folks (in the security space) who feel otherwise 
>seem to be SAML, and even there some folks wish they didn't do things 
>that way.
>
>	/r$
>
>PS:  Tooo little sleep, too much whimsey, but the basic point stands. :)
>-- 
>Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
>DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
>XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
>XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>