RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

John,

I think the comment arose from looking at the IPR statements.  I would like
to say something a bit more encouraging then point at what he already knows.
But I do recognise that this is a very tricky issue and that generally the
least said the better.

I take it that you think the suggested words sticks out my neck too far.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com]
> Sent: 01 April 2005 16:09
> To: Nick Pope
> Cc: OASIS DSS TC
> Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
>
>
> I would recommend simply providing a pointer to the page of the TC which
> discloses IPR and indicate that that is the IPR of which we are aware to
> date.
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> > From: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>
> > Date: Fri, April 01, 2005 5:40 am
> > To: "OASIS DSS TC" <dss@lists.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > I propose the following response to the IPR question raised below.
> >
> > "Whilst it is not possible to make definitive statements
> regarding IPR we
> > are not aware of any company requiring payment of royalties for
> use of the
> > DSS core protocol."
> >
> > Nick Pope
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nick Pope [mailto:pope@secstan.com]
> > > Sent: 21 March 2005 17:40
> > > To: OASIS DSS TC
> > > Subject: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> > >
> > >
> > > Forwarding FYI
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org]
> > > Sent: 21 March 2005 11:12
> > > To: dss-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: [dss-comment] Public Comment
> > >
> > >
> > > Comment from: arm@dif.um.es
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm writing you because I would like to comment that in the
> new release of
> > > the document, it is commented that in the enveloping
> signature there is a
> > > new attribute ObjectId. However, this attribute is missing in the new
> > > schema.
> > >
> > > The other comment is that I have some doubts about IPR
> statements. I have
> > > being seen them, and I would like to know if the
> implementation of this
> > > specification supposes the payment of some royalties to the
> > > enterprise that
> > > claims some IPR.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Antonio.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dss-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your
> TCs in OASIS
> > at:
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>