[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebcore-cppa] CPPA version 3 agreement on "semantics" RE: [ebcore-cppa] Notes from CPP/CPA call 2010-02-12
Hello, With respect to Cristiano's question, the ebBP standard has an element that we could use: <xsd:complexType name="BusinessDocumentType"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation>The type related to a Business Document.</xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="Documentation" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xsd:element ref="ConditionExpression" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> <xsd:element ref="Specification" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attributeGroup ref="name"/> </xsd:complexType> I guess there are some formal IPR issues that would force any feedback we might want to request from other groups to be posted to the comment list. Pim -----Original Message----- From: Moberg Dale [mailto:dmoberg@axway.com] Sent: 17 February 2010 23:45 To: Pim van der Eijk; ebcore-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Breininger, Kathryn R Subject: RE: [ebcore-cppa] CPPA version 3 agreement on "semantics" RE: [ebcore-cppa] Notes from CPP/CPA call 2010-02-12 I know this Friday I may have some conflicts. I will not know until 11. I think your idea about an invitation is a good one. Is there a UNCEFACT list we could send to also? -----Original Message----- From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:pvde@sonnenglanz.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:42 PM To: Moberg Dale; ebcore-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: 'Breininger, Kathryn R' Subject: RE: [ebcore-cppa] CPPA version 3 agreement on "semantics" RE: [ebcore-cppa] Notes from CPP/CPA call 2010-02-12 Hello Dale, Yes, it might be of sufficient interest to ebCore generally. I am hoping we can have a meeting next Friday, also since I want to discuss and progress my Party Id type document. Some of the people that may have an opinion are not ebCore members, do we want to use some mailing lists like ebxml-dev or ubl-dev? Pim -----Original Message----- From: Moberg Dale [mailto:dmoberg@axway.com] Sent: 17 February 2010 20:07 To: Pim van der Eijk; ebcore-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebcore-cppa] CPPA version 3 agreement on "semantics" RE: [ebcore-cppa] Notes from CPP/CPA call 2010-02-12 2) Cristiano's request Pete looked into this. There are some extensibility points, but they don't seem to provide what Cristiano requested. With a document (or constituent part), we would need to specify (i) the referenced external document, (ii) the namespace or type of such a document and (iii) some indication of the what the external document says about the document or part. Like additional validation constraints, profiling rules, other types of semantic alignment. Dale proposes to bring some more people to the discussion and will draft some input for discussion. I am hoping that we can have a discussion of what would be needed to add to the CPPA to at least meet some of Christiano Novelli's use cases (references to XSLTs, Schematron test documents, other kinds of semantic check processing) agreed upon for the exchange of semantically aligned documents. Especially welcome would be those with CC and UBL expertise, for example, who could comment on what is needed. The "packaging" element is currently the only place where any agreed upon conventions concerning data quality (at a semantic level) are found. But the media-types or xsd namespaces referenced are presumably only a small part of what might be needed. Basically we need to design some "buckets" for agreed-upon semantic alignment constraint materials, and are wondering how varied the contents might be. Can we add this to the agenda as a discussion from ebCore partipants generally? ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_work groups.php ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_work groups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]