[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] eBusiness Metamodel EARLY DRAFT 0.03
Monica J. Martin wrote > > mm1: Duane, this seems to reflect functionality that does not exist or > is planned later in some of the technical specification development. I > am interested where the requirements came from and where those > requirements are held/defined, given the changes you have made in the > model. That is incorrect. It is forensic and is taken from the existing approved specs (BP v 1.01, CPA v 2.0, MS v 2.0, CCTS v 2.01, UMM N090 R12, TA 1.04 and eb Requirements v 1.06). What components are you referring to? > > mm1: If you look at the work item list for ebBP v2.0 you will find > that we have resolved to make TTP an element with conditionality > likely attached. Cool + 1 > > mm1: See comments (not flames in notes in the .pdf) for ease of > understanding comment to model. C'mon - no flames??? I figured such work was at least good for 2-5 flames ;-) I am not able to work on this right now but will resume when things are less busy. D -- Senior Standards Strategist Adobe Systems, Inc. http://www.adobe.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]