[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
Matt, Sounds like you are drinking the BCM Kool-Aid here! ; -) BCM definately talks about the business way to go after finding patterns - while how to define those patterns is left as an exercise to the reader - domain specific. If we are going after an illustrative approach here - that's a bit more formal than just using PPT to draw boxes and lines - then I can grok that, eh?! Thanks, DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew MacKenzie" <mattm@adobe.com> To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>; "'ebSOA'" <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:25 PM Subject: RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns > Take a look at what I am proposing in the latest draft. Its not so much a > pattern language as a template for describing the abstract patterns we are > addressing. > > Thanks, Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:09 AM > To: ebSOA > Subject: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns > > I'm taking a step back and re-examining our discussions on patterns that > have occurred over the past several weeks, and have some questions > please: > > (1) I know we've said that we've decided that we would create a pattern > language - is that what we *really* want? Is it too low-level (i.e. > toward assembly language) for the purposes of this TC? Patterns can be > conveyed without the use of a pattern language, as IBM does in their SOA > Patterns redbook. > > (2) What are some examples of existing pattern languages? I did not see > any glaring references in any of the e-mail threads. > > Thanks, > Joe > -- > Kind Regards, > Joseph Chiusano > Associate > Booz | Allen | Hamilton > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]