RE: [ebsoa] InfoWorld SOA Executive Forum planning

["Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>]

FYI:

The document revision named OASIS SOA RM Specification V 8
(wd-soa-rm-08.pdf) has been submitted by Dr. Francis McCabe to the OASIS
SOA Reference Model TC document repository.  This document is revision
#1 of wd-soa-rm-08.pdf.

Document Description:
This is draft 8 of the Reference Model for Service Oriented
Architecture.

View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/document.php?documen
t_id=14426

Download Document:  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/14426/w
d-soa-rm-08.pdf

Revision:
This document is revision #1 of wd-soa-rm-08.pdf.  The document details
page referenced above will show the complete revision history.


PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email
application may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able
to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your
web browser.

-OASIS Open Administration

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:47 PM
To: john@maphin.net
Cc: goran.zugic@semantion.com; Vasco.Drecun@cpd-associates.com;
hmalek@us.fujitsu.com; michael.ruiz@baesystems.com;
dcastle@ebxmlsoft.com; george.w.brown@intel.com; david@drrw.info;
sallystamand@yahoo.com; ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org;
carol.geyer@oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] InfoWorld SOA Executive Forum planning

     Thanks; keeping it in the TC list will ensure hat it remains
available 
to members and the public.
     Also, can someone tell us (OASIS staff, esp. our Carol Geyer) if
the 
TC is planning anything at the InfoWorld event?  Thanks & regards  JBC

At 10:39 AM 9/13/2005, John Hardin wrote:
>Let's move this discussion out to the list at large. I have included
the 
>listserv on this copy.
>
>John Hardin wrote:
>>CPD Assoc. and ebXMLsoft team -
>>These two documents look very complete from a FERA based SOA solution 
>>viewpoint, although I am assuming that the other documents are the 
>>missing information models (we have SOA IM document so far). So I am 
>>confident that given the quality here that the other IM documents will
be 
>>as well done and complete.
>>What I am concerned about is that we begin to understand the SOA-RM 
>>materials so that we can draw mappings between the two approaches. 
>>Ideally I believe that we should be able to reference the SOA-RM
abstract 
>>concepts in each of the sections where appropriate within the context
of 
>>the Run Time SOA.
>>Has anyone given thought to this?