Re: [ebxml-bp] work base 1.01 or 1.10?

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Kenji,

The situation is this - we have to use 1.01 as baseline as that was
the last joint OASIS/CEFACT release.

Now within the TC we are rapidly adding to that to bring it up to
same level as 1.1 - people are making the same submissions
to OASIS of edits and changes - as were made before - so we 
will have our own version now.

The key thing is that this will mean all the features that are in
1.1 will be in the OASIS version soon - so you will be able to
reference them.

Monica started collecting issues and resolutions this week to
make all this happen.   Monica can advise on the status of
all this - I think it will take us a couple more meeting before
we can organize all this - and accept the submissions and
approve their use.

Thanks, DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <nagahashi@fla.fujitsu.com>
To: "ebXML BP" <ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:26 PM
Subject: [ebxml-bp] work base 1.01 or 1.10?


> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to tell you where my question during the last meeting came from.
> (Thank you Monica, for encouraging me.) 
> 
> My question was: which version of UN BPSS, 1.01 or 1.10, to use as our 
> formal work base. Current charter says 1.01.
> 
> After version 1.01, we didn't have formal release for long until 1.10. 
> In the meantime, 1.05, although it is not a formal release, is widely 
> circulated and some vendors (including Fujitsu :-)) had implemented 1.05 
> in their products, since 1.05 has some useful improvements over 1.01. 
> They expected they'll have new public version compatible with 1.05 soon 
> and simply could not wait...
> 
> Since 1.10 is technically compatible with 1.05 (I believe... I haven't 
> had precise look into it yet), vendors will feel relieved if the charter 
> says we base our work on 1.10. Or we can just formally announce we'll 
> keep compatiblity with 1.10 as much as we can, leaving the charter as-is.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
> Regards,
> Kenji
> 
>