[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] ebXML Business Processes XML instance document for execution?
I support the idea of BPSS instance being "executable" but I think that there's a need for a 3rd configuration document, besides BPSS and CPPA, that would link a BusinessTransaction activity with some legacy system that would generate/consume business documents (for instance a BPEL engine, as in David's example). I don't think that this is part of BPSS since is partner specific, not necessarily public knowledge, but a BP can't be configured to be executed by a BP engine without it - unless it is a simple exchange of static documents. Comments?? Regards, Diego > Martin Sachs wrote: > > In my opinion, the BPSS instance document should contain > enough information > to be executable. I believe that that has always been the > intent of the > ebXML side of things. Strictly speaking, "executable" is the > wrong term. > The BPSS instance document should be able to be deployed into > the runtime > system. In other words, the BPSS document should be able to > be used to > configure the runtime system to execute and monitor the > business process > that it describes. That's the same idea as deploying the CPA > into the > runtime system to configure it for doing business between the > two partners > that agreed to that CPA. Such a runtime system is sometimes > referred to as > a BSI (business service interface) in ebXML lingo. > > Regards, > Marty > > At 01:15 AM 11/2/2003 -0700, Sacha Schlegel wrote: > >Hi ebXML BP TC > > > >Coming backwards from a CPA (sample Negotiation CPA) to the ebXML > >Business Process (sample Negotiation Business Process) I thought that > >the BP XML Instance document should have enough information to be > >executable. > > > >But for some reasons I now think that I misunderstand. > > > >Any hints where to catch up on ebXML BPSS, what it is and > what it isn't? > > > >Kind regards. > > > >Sacha Schlegel > > > >PS: I admit that I did not read any BPEL (or XLANG, WSFL) or > >WS-Orchestration specification but the ebXML BPSS 1.0 > >-- > >------------------------------------------------ > >Sacha Schlegel > >------------------------------------------------ > >4 Warwick Str, 6102 St. James, Perth, Australia > >sacha@schlegel.li www.schlegel.li > >public key: www.schlegel.li/sacha.gpg > >------------------------------------------------ > > ************************************* > Martin Sachs > standards architect > Cyclone Commerce > msachs@cyclonecommerce.com > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]